Grasshopper reads a newspap r , regrets it
A meaningless pile of words meant to harm, a Harmacide, scamdemic examined, deconstructed , doubted...
Warning/disclaimer, freedom of speech 1st amendment protected content ahead: This piece contains lies, misinformation, dismissinformation, SARCASM, and idle fanciful speculation, not a word of it is true nor to be believed, so there.
Exercising freedom of speech, to read freely and fathom the full con text of the word. And speculate on the publisher….
But first, our photo for today, I call it, a meaningless pile of words….although I only took the photo, I did not build it. But thanks to the artist for the work.
So I heard from a little bird who's last name I misspelled slightly when I cited him in my last post, and also from Alex christoforou and Alexander Mercouris that the old farty is gone to China for an unofficial official visit, Scotty Ritter says we oughta respect his weight and age if not the smell of his war crimes that emanate.
https://korybko.substack.com/p/kissingers-surprise-trip-to-beijing
Link above has a photo and details , although i don’t wish to put Hankie’s ugly face herein, i did wish to relate Garland Nixon’s comment that the Hankstery went to visit behind the Biden’s back, as it were, and explains why there is no other press about this that i could find, but there is that picture if you go there.
I have to say, I hope these masters of the u inverse can stop the war before it proceeds furthermore , but also I'm glad I don't have to face that ugly old f¿CK and if you do, hold your stomache. I gather hankie is uglier in real life….some of us age disgracefully in the throes of the mad hegemon…
https://sonar21.com/why-nato-was-obsessed-with-ukraine-and-is-now-in-a-panic/
This link above has the cartoon at the top and I commend the text too.
Now about that article in a newspap r, first let’s warm up with this Igor Chudov fresh piece, which is a nice
lead in to what i want to discuss…
I saw this, which I tried to ignore, but then I read this swill, and spit it back out…
And then the rest of the piece…
So
This from a newspap r in the box…
So this from today's SF killafornia Examiner, boldy declaring
Tomorrow Lies West, sic, and today's lies too, front and center. wednesday July 19, 2023.
They cite sfexaminer.com and …
Clint Reilly communications.
My take on Clint is he was hoping an aeroplane would come take out triple 5 California and he could collect the insurance,but I digress,he owns 465 California,possibly, but not the brother of building 7, which is 555 killafornia there.
What dirty trix are for Clint that went along with his occupation? Campaign finance and recall prevention management? Nope, Clint tis a good Christian, or Catholic, I get them two confused….what's the difference, pray tell?
This from a newspap r in the box…,the images above. Maybe they'll makeup corrections to the online, if this even got in there
.
I don't wish to name the author, she must have been writing what she was told, but you can see it in the pic.
Article title:
COVID -19 sic.
Study: Vax for pregnant women protects their babies
Subtitle:
UCSF report finds no evidence of adverse effects stemming from use of mRNA vaccines . Sic.
By …
Examiner staff writer.
The writer sic claims that women “suffered no adverse effects.” In the JAMA Network Open sic that published the study….
So first off, at the head , these folks are women, although by the end of the article they become pregnant people.
Let me just tell you that I don't know of any people getting pregnant, sorry. Only women. This is why I call it Womanity, if I may. But I am too Damm picky.
The last paragraph or two bemoans how “pregnant people” (that includes pregnant males and pregnant female and other genders, implied) should be included in research, and are really willing to be,” says Dr Arianna Cassidy. Keep your kids and wives away from her…..
We have known as long as there has been medical science that pregnant women, ahem, not men and others who pretend to be , ought indeed not to be subject to studies that risk their kids.
Now I know they say In This article how tis all swell for the younguns, but I don't buy it, nor believe them, which only went studied for a year, but I doubt the claimed results of safety and efficacy, it sounds like a load of lies to me.
To cite only the most glaring example…
Paragraph 1, they claim “A UCSF study published last week in JAMA Network Open found that pregnant women who got the covid-19 mRNA vaccine during their pregnancy suffered no adverse effects.”
That is the sum total first paragraph, as newspap rs are wont to do, they can’t fit more than one sentence into a paragraph, it would be too complex… and pardon me for belaboring the point to highlight their lies, with my redundancy…
Paragraph 2: “High anitibody levels were recorded in both mother and child, actually protecting the latter for at least six months after being born.”
Honestly, i just don’t buy it. No i didn’t read the study, nor will i, i am retiring from my career of biochemicalgeneology and viral immunology, and i unsubscribed to Jessica Rose, so i only approach as a lay person, not that i been geting laid at all, don’t be confused…
Paragraph 3: “Mothers who experienced some side effects from the vaccines were found to have even higher antibody levels,” which they then go on to suggest is even better, nevermind they just said there were no side effects, if you got any nonexistent side effects, like, well, we’ll get to them, then you are even luckier, you lucky goat, or lucky goose. … honk.
So, it took all of three paragraphs to demolish this narrative, hmmm, have to try harder next time.
Later ,
the doctor who i’ve already cited who told the author what to write? or maybe wrote the original “study” either before or after conducting it…
she said, 60% of pregant women, yes females, were of the mind to skip this nonsense vaxxx, which you know they spell with xxx’s too, right there in their title, because that makes it look cuter and more trustworthy, less insidious, loosely defined, a vaxxx, a pancake stax, a trip to tj maxxx, get yours now…
It is comforting to know they admit more than half of the females of Womanity don’t want no Harmacide scamdemic messing up their kids, good instinct!!!
Then they go for the fear, claiming if you aren’t vaxxed and you contract the virus, you can “suffer serious consequences,” if you contract the virus. Or if you lose your job. Or if you eat pickles and ice cream. or if you smoke crack and then snort fentanyl, which are the more serious of these consequences?> i can’t decide, luckily i ain’t pregant.
Now i ain’t smart, but i couldn’t help but notice, when they spoke about these shots, they didn’t tell me, nor you, how many, how far apart, none of that, only whether they were the phyzier or the modernrra , one being stonger. They claim the stronger offers better protection… i didn’t read of any evidence of that, or even what exactly the vague protection is for or from, oh yeah, the Flubah, how could i forget? did i lose my mind, and drop the narrative about that bioweapon injextion that can kill your small child and even your pets and animals ? they didn’t mention none of that, nor the whole shedding from the breast milk killing infants thing, i must have just imagined that from better literature, not this nobel prizewinner herein.
They also say that there aren’t any “vaccines” available for under 6 months, i guess, so they go after the mother until they can get to the child directly. Vampires.
One last time, the lack of side effects is proclaimed long and loudly, on p. 4, the second half of the article, i quote
“The study also found that mothers who experience side effects (emphasis mine) from the vaccine shots— such as
fever, chills and headaches —
actually wound up having an even stronger antibody response than those who didn’t
“
i am just so glad i am too stupid to understand that there may be more to your immune response than an antibody response, since my name ain’t Geert…pheww, saved by the sluggish virugandistic virulogy again. My spelling ain’t too good neither, oh well.
You know, i had so much more i wanted to discuss, but i am feeling, well, like i need to go catch up on the latest terrorist attacks against Russia, and so i can only leave you with this heartwarming and totally unrelated link, which i encourage perusal of, if you’re side effects hadn’t kicked in yet…
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/07/19/leaked-files-suggest-hidden-british-hand-in-latest-kerch-bridge-strike/
They’ll have to try harder to hide their hidden hands, moving forward, lest Dmitry Medvedev suspect the randy Brits are up to no good and spout some real firebreathing rhetoric, or sprout electoral ambitions…
Thanks for bearing with my literary theory and deconstruxion, don’t tell anyone
Regards and blessings to you and your beloved children, worship and adore the future of Womanity, and keep them safe from the harm that would befall the defenseless amongst us, Praise the Good Lord, by the Grace of God, but for the light…therein would go i…
I'm not sure when all this advice changed for pregnant women. Maybe when they started calling them pregnant "people"? When I was pregnant, although 40+yrs ago, the warnings of what I could no longer do, solely for the safety of the developing child in my uterus was quite long. No tuna (too much mercury); no aspirin or Tylenol (this was also around the time of the off-the-shelf Tylenol poisonings/deaths); no hair dye; no perms! (very popular back then); no oral medications of ANY kind, OTC or RX or "recreational"; no commercial skin lotions; be choosy about personal hygiene products of all types, shampoo, condition, soap, hairspray, etc; avoid sunscreen-just stay out of the sun altogether; no coffee; no soda; cut down on red meat; no cleaning out the cat litter box (not applicable); no contact with pet shampoos or flea/heartworm meds; no contact with household cleaners like bleach or ammonia; no horse back riding; no mowing the yard; etc, etc, etc. It goes without saying the obstetricians back then would've completely lost their sh!t if someone recommended any injection, much less a completely new technology, never tested on humans!! Clown world. Any pregnant "person" who submits not only their body, but their unborn child's body to the sCiEnCe of today, probably shouldn't have children...and quite possibly won't
You listen to Alex Christorofu also? I find him interesting. I don’t know anyone else who listens to him.